Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 29.06.2025 01:59

Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Is Apple Looking To Catch Up In AI With Big Deal? - Investor's Business Daily
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
What’s next?
Let’s just make it real clear:
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Just in the last 5 years:
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Week in Review: Perplexity Labs wants to do your work - TechCrunch
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
First look at ‘state-of-the-art’ Coca-Cola Amphitheater before gates open to public - AL.com
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Milky Way galaxy might not collide with Andromeda after all - Ars Technica
Thank you.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
What is the best way to get a free content marketing certification course?
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Alaska Airlines to launch Seattle-to-Rome nonstop flights in 2026 - KING5.com